Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC accepted petitioner's alternative proposal to pay additional 5% of outstanding tax demand for AY 2011-12, bringing total payment to 20% of assessed amount. This compliance with CBDT instructions dated 31.07.2017 results in stay of balance demand. Court deemed adjustment of AY 2024-25 refund against AY 2011-12 demand permissible, subject to increased payment. Ruling aligns with established tax administration guidelines on partial payment requirements for demand stays. Court found proposal equitable, balancing revenue interests with taxpayer's financial position.
HC accepted petitioner's alternative proposal to pay additional 5% of outstanding tax demand for AY 2011-12, bringing total payment to 20% of assessed amount. This compliance with CBDT instructions dated 31.07.2017 results in stay of balance demand. Court deemed adjustment of AY 2024-25 refund against AY 2011-12 demand permissible, subject to increased payment. Ruling aligns with established tax administration guidelines on partial payment requirements for demand stays. Court found proposal equitable, balancing revenue interests with taxpayer's financial position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.