<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Demand Stay Granted After Taxpayer Agrees to Pay Additional 5% Under CBDT Instructions, Total Payment Reaches 20%</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86253</link>
    <description>HC accepted petitioner&#039;s alternative proposal to pay additional 5% of outstanding tax demand for AY 2011-12, bringing total payment to 20% of assessed amount. This compliance with CBDT instructions dated 31.07.2017 results in stay of balance demand. Court deemed adjustment of AY 2024-25 refund against AY 2011-12 demand permissible, subject to increased payment. Ruling aligns with established tax administration guidelines on partial payment requirements for demand stays. Court found proposal equitable, balancing revenue interests with taxpayer&#039;s financial position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Demand Stay Granted After Taxpayer Agrees to Pay Additional 5% Under CBDT Instructions, Total Payment Reaches 20%</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86253</link>
      <description>HC accepted petitioner&#039;s alternative proposal to pay additional 5% of outstanding tax demand for AY 2011-12, bringing total payment to 20% of assessed amount. This compliance with CBDT instructions dated 31.07.2017 results in stay of balance demand. Court deemed adjustment of AY 2024-25 refund against AY 2011-12 demand permissible, subject to increased payment. Ruling aligns with established tax administration guidelines on partial payment requirements for demand stays. Court found proposal equitable, balancing revenue interests with taxpayer&#039;s financial position.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>