Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
NCLAT affirmed the approval of a resolution plan where unsecured dissenting financial creditors received Rs.1.5 Crore against their admitted claim of Rs.10.94 Crore, representing 13.44% vote share. The plan secured 86.67% CoC approval within the 330-day CIRP period. The Tribunal held that the payout complied with Section 30(2)(b) of IBC, rejecting appellant's contention regarding homebuyers receiving units without haircuts. The fact that Adjudicating Authority's approval came on 14.05.2024, after the CIRP period, was deemed immaterial since the plan was approved and filed within the statutory timeframe. The NCLAT emphasized its limited jurisdiction to interfere with resolution plans and dismissed the appeal, finding no violation of statutory requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.