Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding addition under s. 56(2)(viib) for alleged excess share premium. The disputed amount arose from a nominal rounding difference of Rs. 0.09 per share on allotment of 1 crore equity shares to existing shareholders in proportion to their shareholding ratio. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s order unsustainable as the share allotment maintained original shareholding patterns without substantive premium excess. The technical rounding difference did not constitute premium warranting addition under s. 56(2)(viib). Addition deleted based on assessee's submission demonstrating proportional allotment to existing shareholders with unchanged shareholding ratios.
ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding addition under s. 56(2)(viib) for alleged excess share premium. The disputed amount arose from a nominal rounding difference of Rs. 0.09 per share on allotment of 1 crore equity shares to existing shareholders in proportion to their shareholding ratio. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s order unsustainable as the share allotment maintained original shareholding patterns without substantive premium excess. The technical rounding difference did not constitute premium warranting addition under s. 56(2)(viib). Addition deleted based on assessee's submission demonstrating proportional allotment to existing shareholders with unchanged shareholding ratios.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
