Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Payment made by bearer cheques to material suppliers in assessee's contract business was challenged under s.40A(3). Gram Panchayat Mukhias' certificates confirmed absence of bank branches in suppliers' villages. ITAT held Rule 6DDJ applicable, validating bearer cheque payments due to banking infrastructure limitations. Regarding s.40(a)(ia) violation for non-deduction of TDS on Rs.2,95,000 paid to Mangla Planners for map design, matter remanded to AO following Hindusthan Coca Cola precedent. AO directed to verify if recipients declared amounts as taxable income and examine whether their income falls below taxable threshold. Disallowance under s.40A(3) reversed; s.40(a)(ia) issue remanded for verification.
Payment made by bearer cheques to material suppliers in assessee's contract business was challenged under s.40A(3). Gram Panchayat Mukhias' certificates confirmed absence of bank branches in suppliers' villages. ITAT held Rule 6DDJ applicable, validating bearer cheque payments due to banking infrastructure limitations. Regarding s.40(a)(ia) violation for non-deduction of TDS on Rs.2,95,000 paid to Mangla Planners for map design, matter remanded to AO following Hindusthan Coca Cola precedent. AO directed to verify if recipients declared amounts as taxable income and examine whether their income falls below taxable threshold. Disallowance under s.40A(3) reversed; s.40(a)(ia) issue remanded for verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
