TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable in respect of bearer cheque payments made to suppliers of material in villages where banking facilities were unavailable; (ii) whether the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for payments made for map design and planning required deletion or verification regarding taxability in the hands of the recipients.
Issue (i): Whether disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable in respect of bearer cheque payments made to suppliers of material in villages where banking facilities were unavailable.
Analysis: Certificates from the relevant village Mukhias were on record and confirmed that no bank or branch of a bank was operating in the concerned villages. In such circumstances, the cash-payment exception embodied in Rule 6DD(j) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 was attracted and the assessee could not be faulted for making payments in the manner adopted.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40A(3) was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for payments made for map design and planning required deletion or verification regarding taxability in the hands of the recipients.
Analysis: The amount involved was stated to have been paid to Mangalam Planners and other persons for design and planning work. The matter required verification as to whether the recipients had offered the amounts to tax and whether their incomes were below the taxable limit.
Conclusion: The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and was not finally deleted; it was disposed of partly in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The addition under section 40A(3) was deleted, while the issue under section 40(a)(ia) was remitted for factual verification, resulting in only partial relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where banking facilities are unavailable in the relevant locality and the factual exception under the rules is established, section 40A(3) cannot be invoked to disallow the payment; a separate TDS-related disallowance may be remitted for verification of taxability in the hands of the recipients.
TaxTMI 
