Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
HC determined that the contractor was liable to pay GST at 18% on taxable turnover from works contract, while respondent had only reimbursed 12%. Based on contractual obligations requiring full GST reimbursement, which remained uncontested, respondent must pay the differential 6% GST amount. Court directed respondent to reimburse contractor for the difference between GST paid (18%) and amount already reimbursed (12%). Additionally, any interest charges levied by GST authorities for late payment must also be reimbursed by respondent. Writ petition disposed with directions for differential GST reimbursement.
HC determined that the contractor was liable to pay GST at 18% on taxable turnover from works contract, while respondent had only reimbursed 12%. Based on contractual obligations requiring full GST reimbursement, which remained uncontested, respondent must pay the differential 6% GST amount. Court directed respondent to reimburse contractor for the difference between GST paid (18%) and amount already reimbursed (12%). Additionally, any interest charges levied by GST authorities for late payment must also be reimbursed by respondent. Writ petition disposed with directions for differential GST reimbursement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.