TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, having paid GST at 18% on the works contract, was entitled to reimbursement from the respondent of the differential amount over and above the GST already reimbursed at 12%.
Analysis: The petitioner's liability to pay GST at 18% on the taxable turnover arising from the contract was accepted. The controversy was confined to the contractual incidence of tax reimbursement. Since the respondent had reimbursed only 12% and the contractual claim that the respondent was bound to reimburse the full amount of GST paid was not contradicted, the petitioner was entitled to recover the shortfall. The direction also covered any interest recovered from the petitioner on account of delayed tax payment.
Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded on the claim for reimbursement of the differential GST of 6%, together with any interest recovered for late payment.
TaxTMI 
