Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT quashed notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings initiated by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The assessee's case fell under ITO Ward 70(3), Delhi's jurisdiction per section 124 of IT Act. The department had not exercised transfer powers under sections 120 or 127. The tribunal found that the assessee provided sufficient evidence establishing Delhi jurisdiction, making the Jaipur ACIT's notice legally invalid. The improper jurisdictional notice rendered all consequential assessment proceedings void. The assessee's appeal was allowed, invalidating both the reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings.
ITAT quashed notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings initiated by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The assessee's case fell under ITO Ward 70(3), Delhi's jurisdiction per section 124 of IT Act. The department had not exercised transfer powers under sections 120 or 127. The tribunal found that the assessee provided sufficient evidence establishing Delhi jurisdiction, making the Jaipur ACIT's notice legally invalid. The improper jurisdictional notice rendered all consequential assessment proceedings void. The assessee's appeal was allowed, invalidating both the reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
