Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC set aside the order requiring mandatory 20% deposit of disputed tax demand as precondition for stay application hearing. The court found this requirement violated both Income Tax Act 1961 and CBDT guidelines. Per CBDT circular, 20% deposit requirement applies only after authority determines prima facie merit for interim relief. Authority failed to consider possibility of reducing deposit percentage based on assessee's circumstances. Matter remanded for fresh consideration within 4 weeks in accordance with guidelines, requiring reasoned order on stay application merits before imposing any deposit conditions.
HC set aside the order requiring mandatory 20% deposit of disputed tax demand as precondition for stay application hearing. The court found this requirement violated both Income Tax Act 1961 and CBDT guidelines. Per CBDT circular, 20% deposit requirement applies only after authority determines prima facie merit for interim relief. Authority failed to consider possibility of reducing deposit percentage based on assessee's circumstances. Matter remanded for fresh consideration within 4 weeks in accordance with guidelines, requiring reasoned order on stay application merits before imposing any deposit conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
