Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC set aside the order requiring mandatory 20% deposit of disputed tax demand as precondition for stay application hearing. The court found this requirement violated both Income Tax Act 1961 and CBDT guidelines. Per CBDT circular, 20% deposit requirement applies only after authority determines prima facie merit for interim relief. Authority failed to consider possibility of reducing deposit percentage based on assessee's circumstances. Matter remanded for fresh consideration within 4 weeks in accordance with guidelines, requiring reasoned order on stay application merits before imposing any deposit conditions.
HC set aside the order requiring mandatory 20% deposit of disputed tax demand as precondition for stay application hearing. The court found this requirement violated both Income Tax Act 1961 and CBDT guidelines. Per CBDT circular, 20% deposit requirement applies only after authority determines prima facie merit for interim relief. Authority failed to consider possibility of reducing deposit percentage based on assessee's circumstances. Matter remanded for fresh consideration within 4 weeks in accordance with guidelines, requiring reasoned order on stay application merits before imposing any deposit conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
