Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT cancelled penalty under s271AAB as taxpayer's disclosure of Rs. 50 lakhs during search proceedings was voluntary and not connected to search findings. While valuables were found in locker 932A, no disclosure was made during locker search statement. Revenue's argument that disclosure occurred only due to search was rejected since Assessing Officer failed to correlate seized documents with the disclosed amount. The voluntary nature of disclosure, unconnected to search materials or discovered assets, meant it could not be classified as undisclosed income warranting penalty. ITAT held penalty was not sustainable as fundamental requirement of connecting disclosed income to search findings was not established.
ITAT cancelled penalty under s271AAB as taxpayer's disclosure of Rs. 50 lakhs during search proceedings was voluntary and not connected to search findings. While valuables were found in locker 932A, no disclosure was made during locker search statement. Revenue's argument that disclosure occurred only due to search was rejected since Assessing Officer failed to correlate seized documents with the disclosed amount. The voluntary nature of disclosure, unconnected to search materials or discovered assets, meant it could not be classified as undisclosed income warranting penalty. ITAT held penalty was not sustainable as fundamental requirement of connecting disclosed income to search findings was not established.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.