Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable on the amount disclosed by the assessee.
Analysis: The penalty could not be sustained merely on the objection that the show-cause notice did not specify the exact limb, because the notice was not invalid on that ground. However, for section 271AAB to apply, the income must answer the statutory description of "undisclosed income" arising from search material or related entries. The assessee's disclosure was found to be voluntary and not shown to be linked to any incriminating material, money, bullion, jewellery, valuable article, or relevant entry found in the course of search. The revenue also failed to correlate the disclosed amount with the seized material.
Conclusion: The amount disclosed did not constitute undisclosed income for the purpose of section 271AAB, and the penalty was not leviable. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.