Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging extension of timeline for submission of Expression of Interest (EoI) and Resolution Plan during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CoC's decision to extend timeline without issuing fresh Form G was upheld as it aligned with original EoI's Clause 6. Regulation 36B distinguishes between modification and timeline extension, with only modifications requiring fresh Form G publication. Resolution Plan by Pinax Paper Mills Private Limited secured 96.05% voting share. Appellant's objection was rejected as they participated in process post-extension without prior objection, submitting revised plan after removing non-compliant partner. No material irregularity found in Resolution Professional's conduct warranting CIRP process invalidation.
NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging extension of timeline for submission of Expression of Interest (EoI) and Resolution Plan during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CoC's decision to extend timeline without issuing fresh Form G was upheld as it aligned with original EoI's Clause 6. Regulation 36B distinguishes between modification and timeline extension, with only modifications requiring fresh Form G publication. Resolution Plan by Pinax Paper Mills Private Limited secured 96.05% voting share. Appellant's objection was rejected as they participated in process post-extension without prior objection, submitting revised plan after removing non-compliant partner. No material irregularity found in Resolution Professional's conduct warranting CIRP process invalidation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.