Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging extension of timeline for submission of Expression of Interest (EoI) and Resolution Plan during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CoC's decision to extend timeline without issuing fresh Form G was upheld as it aligned with original EoI's Clause 6. Regulation 36B distinguishes between modification and timeline extension, with only modifications requiring fresh Form G publication. Resolution Plan by Pinax Paper Mills Private Limited secured 96.05% voting share. Appellant's objection was rejected as they participated in process post-extension without prior objection, submitting revised plan after removing non-compliant partner. No material irregularity found in Resolution Professional's conduct warranting CIRP process invalidation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.