Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
HC affirmed dismissal of GST appeal filed after 7-month delay. Section 107(4) of GST Act explicitly limits appellate authority's power to condone delay to 30 days only. The Act being a complete code, provisions of Limitation Act Section 5 are inapplicable. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal basis for condonation beyond the statutory 30-day period. Since appeal exceeded permissible delay by over 3 months and appellate authority lacked jurisdiction to condone extended delays, dismissal of appeal on grounds of limitation was legally sound. Petition challenging the dismissal rejected.
HC affirmed dismissal of GST appeal filed after 7-month delay. Section 107(4) of GST Act explicitly limits appellate authority's power to condone delay to 30 days only. The Act being a complete code, provisions of Limitation Act Section 5 are inapplicable. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal basis for condonation beyond the statutory 30-day period. Since appeal exceeded permissible delay by over 3 months and appellate authority lacked jurisdiction to condone extended delays, dismissal of appeal on grounds of limitation was legally sound. Petition challenging the dismissal rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.