Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could condone delay beyond the statutory period of thirty days, and whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied to an appeal filed under that provision.
Analysis: Section 107 prescribes a three-month period for filing an appeal and permits condonation only on sufficient cause being shown for a further period of one month. The provision was treated as a complete code for GST appeals. Since the appeal was filed after more than seven months from the date of the impugned order, the delay exceeded the maximum condonable period. In view of the specific statutory scheme, the general power under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was held inapplicable to such appeals.
Conclusion: The Appellate Authority had no jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond one month, and dismissal of the appeal as time-barred was upheld against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a special statute prescribes a specific limitation period and permits condonation only up to a defined additional period, the appellate authority cannot invoke the general limitation law to extend that period further.