TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of AT determined that a gold purchase transaction of Rs. 1 Crore constituted a benami transaction under PBPTA. The transaction involved RTGS transfer from A's account to firm H, but gold delivery was made to M instead of A. Despite having A's signed invoice received through M, the appellant failed to establish direct delivery to A. Several suspicious elements emerged: cash deposit by non-account holder A, involvement of M who was partner in appellant's other firm B, subsequent closure of H's bank account with proceeds transferred to B where M was also partner. The appellant's claim of good faith was rejected due to irregular business practices and unexplained circumstances surrounding the transaction. The pattern of fund transfer, delivery arrangements, and business relationships indicated deliberate circumvention of normal procedures. Appeal dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
