Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination.
HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.