https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85824 HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:10:06 +0530 Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:10:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85824 HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination. Highlights GST Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:10:06 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85824