Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination.
HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
