Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination.
HC upheld the original ruling, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the administrative proceedings. The appellant had received proper notice (Ext.P2) and submitted a response (Ext.P4), including a request for extension to provide additional clarifications. The procedural timeline allowed for reply submission by 27.12.2024 with personal hearing scheduled for 06.01.2025. The court determined that adequate opportunity for representation was provided, satisfying natural justice requirements. The appellant's contention regarding denial of hearing opportunity was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
