Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority's rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited condonation to one-month period beyond prescribed time, contradicting precedent in S.K. Chakraborty case. Considering petitioner's bona fide intent and absence of deliberate delay, HC directed appellate authority to hear appeal on merits within eight weeks. Court emphasized appellate authority's failure to properly exercise jurisdiction in mechanically rejecting appeal on limitation grounds without adequately considering explanation for delay. Appeal to be heard after giving petitioners opportunity of hearing.
HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority's rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited condonation to one-month period beyond prescribed time, contradicting precedent in S.K. Chakraborty case. Considering petitioner's bona fide intent and absence of deliberate delay, HC directed appellate authority to hear appeal on merits within eight weeks. Court emphasized appellate authority's failure to properly exercise jurisdiction in mechanically rejecting appeal on limitation grounds without adequately considering explanation for delay. Appeal to be heard after giving petitioners opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
