<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Partnership Firm Wins Appeal Delay Condonation After Authority&#039;s Mechanical Rejection Due To Time Limitation Grounds</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85746</link>
    <description>HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority&#039;s rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited condonation to one-month period beyond prescribed time, contradicting precedent in S.K. Chakraborty case. Considering petitioner&#039;s bona fide intent and absence of deliberate delay, HC directed appellate authority to hear appeal on merits within eight weeks. Court emphasized appellate authority&#039;s failure to properly exercise jurisdiction in mechanically rejecting appeal on limitation grounds without adequately considering explanation for delay. Appeal to be heard after giving petitioners opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Partnership Firm Wins Appeal Delay Condonation After Authority&#039;s Mechanical Rejection Due To Time Limitation Grounds</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85746</link>
      <description>HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority&#039;s rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited condonation to one-month period beyond prescribed time, contradicting precedent in S.K. Chakraborty case. Considering petitioner&#039;s bona fide intent and absence of deliberate delay, HC directed appellate authority to hear appeal on merits within eight weeks. Court emphasized appellate authority&#039;s failure to properly exercise jurisdiction in mechanically rejecting appeal on limitation grounds without adequately considering explanation for delay. Appeal to be heard after giving petitioners opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>