Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
CESTAT upheld denial of Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption under Notification dated 17.03.2012 for imported goods valued at Rs. 73.79 Crores during 2013-2017. Appellant failed to declare goods in Delhi VAT returns and provide supporting documentation, violating notification requirements for state destination declaration and VAT registration disclosure. Principal Commissioner's findings established fraudulent practices through false declarations and non-compliance with exemption conditions. Tribunal confirmed recovery of SAD with penalties, noting appellant's failure to controvert evidence of tax evasion and misrepresentation. Appeal dismissed, affirming original order requiring payment of duties and penalties.
CESTAT upheld denial of Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption under Notification dated 17.03.2012 for imported goods valued at Rs. 73.79 Crores during 2013-2017. Appellant failed to declare goods in Delhi VAT returns and provide supporting documentation, violating notification requirements for state destination declaration and VAT registration disclosure. Principal Commissioner's findings established fraudulent practices through false declarations and non-compliance with exemption conditions. Tribunal confirmed recovery of SAD with penalties, noting appellant's failure to controvert evidence of tax evasion and misrepresentation. Appeal dismissed, affirming original order requiring payment of duties and penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
