<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Special Additional Duty Exemption Denied After Importer Failed to Declare Goods Worth 73.79 Crores in VAT Returns</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85667</link>
    <description>CESTAT upheld denial of Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption under Notification dated 17.03.2012 for imported goods valued at Rs. 73.79 Crores during 2013-2017. Appellant failed to declare goods in Delhi VAT returns and provide supporting documentation, violating notification requirements for state destination declaration and VAT registration disclosure. Principal Commissioner&#039;s findings established fraudulent practices through false declarations and non-compliance with exemption conditions. Tribunal confirmed recovery of SAD with penalties, noting appellant&#039;s failure to controvert evidence of tax evasion and misrepresentation. Appeal dismissed, affirming original order requiring payment of duties and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Special Additional Duty Exemption Denied After Importer Failed to Declare Goods Worth 73.79 Crores in VAT Returns</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85667</link>
      <description>CESTAT upheld denial of Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption under Notification dated 17.03.2012 for imported goods valued at Rs. 73.79 Crores during 2013-2017. Appellant failed to declare goods in Delhi VAT returns and provide supporting documentation, violating notification requirements for state destination declaration and VAT registration disclosure. Principal Commissioner&#039;s findings established fraudulent practices through false declarations and non-compliance with exemption conditions. Tribunal confirmed recovery of SAD with penalties, noting appellant&#039;s failure to controvert evidence of tax evasion and misrepresentation. Appeal dismissed, affirming original order requiring payment of duties and penalties.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:30:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>