Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT determined reimbursed expenses received by a Customs House Agent (CHA) from clients are not includible in the taxable value for service tax assessment. Following SC's ruling in UOI v Intercontinental Consultants case, the tribunal held that Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules 2006 was ultra vires to Sections 66 and 67 of the Act. The expenses reimbursed to CHA, separate from the service fees on which service tax was already paid, cannot form part of the assessable value. The tribunal set aside the original order that had included such reimbursements in the taxable value, allowing the appellant's appeal and confirming that reimbursed expenses fall outside the scope of service tax valuation.
CESTAT determined reimbursed expenses received by a Customs House Agent (CHA) from clients are not includible in the taxable value for service tax assessment. Following SC's ruling in UOI v Intercontinental Consultants case, the tribunal held that Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules 2006 was ultra vires to Sections 66 and 67 of the Act. The expenses reimbursed to CHA, separate from the service fees on which service tax was already paid, cannot form part of the assessable value. The tribunal set aside the original order that had included such reimbursements in the taxable value, allowing the appellant's appeal and confirming that reimbursed expenses fall outside the scope of service tax valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.