Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC determined the arrest unlawful due to failure to comply with Section 50 CrPC's mandate of "forthwith" communication of arrest grounds. The court distinguished between 'grounds of arrest' and 'reasons for arrest', emphasizing that grounds must convey specific facts enabling defense against custodial remand and bail application. While formal arrest occurred at 6:30 PM via arrest memo, the investigating officer's failure to simultaneously serve arrest grounds violated both Section 50 CrPC and Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The court established that "forthwith" requires immediate and concurrent communication of arrest grounds to protect against arbitrary liberty deprivation. The petition challenging the arrest's validity was consequently allowed.
HC determined the arrest unlawful due to failure to comply with Section 50 CrPC's mandate of "forthwith" communication of arrest grounds. The court distinguished between 'grounds of arrest' and 'reasons for arrest', emphasizing that grounds must convey specific facts enabling defense against custodial remand and bail application. While formal arrest occurred at 6:30 PM via arrest memo, the investigating officer's failure to simultaneously serve arrest grounds violated both Section 50 CrPC and Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The court established that "forthwith" requires immediate and concurrent communication of arrest grounds to protect against arbitrary liberty deprivation. The petition challenging the arrest's validity was consequently allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
