Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.