Reassessment disclosure requirements permit stated reasons without revealing information sources, but prior-taxation claims require full examination b...
Independent assessment discretion and corroborated electronic evidence determine validity of on-money additions and undisclosed-consideration assessme...
Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.