Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld the assessment order made under section 143(3) read with section 144B. The assessee's contention regarding violation of Faceless Assessment Scheme due to non-provision of draft assessment order was rejected. Court determined that since it wasn't a best judgment assessment, no draft order was required. The sequential issuance of notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) was deemed procedurally valid as both served the assessment purpose. The assessee's compliance with both notices negated claims of insufficient opportunity. The scrutiny assessment following section 144B procedures was found legally compliant, with no procedural violations warranting interference.
HC upheld the assessment order made under section 143(3) read with section 144B. The assessee's contention regarding violation of Faceless Assessment Scheme due to non-provision of draft assessment order was rejected. Court determined that since it wasn't a best judgment assessment, no draft order was required. The sequential issuance of notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) was deemed procedurally valid as both served the assessment purpose. The assessee's compliance with both notices negated claims of insufficient opportunity. The scrutiny assessment following section 144B procedures was found legally compliant, with no procedural violations warranting interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.