Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC upheld the assessment order made under section 143(3) read with section 144B. The assessee's contention regarding violation of Faceless Assessment Scheme due to non-provision of draft assessment order was rejected. Court determined that since it wasn't a best judgment assessment, no draft order was required. The sequential issuance of notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) was deemed procedurally valid as both served the assessment purpose. The assessee's compliance with both notices negated claims of insufficient opportunity. The scrutiny assessment following section 144B procedures was found legally compliant, with no procedural violations warranting interference.
HC upheld the assessment order made under section 143(3) read with section 144B. The assessee's contention regarding violation of Faceless Assessment Scheme due to non-provision of draft assessment order was rejected. Court determined that since it wasn't a best judgment assessment, no draft order was required. The sequential issuance of notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) was deemed procedurally valid as both served the assessment purpose. The assessee's compliance with both notices negated claims of insufficient opportunity. The scrutiny assessment following section 144B procedures was found legally compliant, with no procedural violations warranting interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
