Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed appeal against addition made under Section 68 for alleged bogus share capital. Three share subscribers - Aakansha Advisory Services Pvt Ltd, Sunirmiti Mercantile Pvt Ltd and Arihant Enterprises Ltd - demonstrated adequate creditworthiness through their balance sheets and financial statements for FY 2016-17. The Tribunal held that assessee successfully discharged onus by establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions. CIT(A)'s dismissal solely on grounds of FY 2015-16 statements being furnished instead of FY 2016-17 was incorrect. Non-compliance with notices under Section 133(6) alone cannot justify addition when substantive evidence of creditworthiness exists. Addition deleted.
ITAT allowed appeal against addition made under Section 68 for alleged bogus share capital. Three share subscribers - Aakansha Advisory Services Pvt Ltd, Sunirmiti Mercantile Pvt Ltd and Arihant Enterprises Ltd - demonstrated adequate creditworthiness through their balance sheets and financial statements for FY 2016-17. The Tribunal held that assessee successfully discharged onus by establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions. CIT(A)'s dismissal solely on grounds of FY 2015-16 statements being furnished instead of FY 2016-17 was incorrect. Non-compliance with notices under Section 133(6) alone cannot justify addition when substantive evidence of creditworthiness exists. Addition deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
