<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Share Capital Addition Under Section 68 Deleted After Subscribers Prove Creditworthiness Through Financial Statements</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85427</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed appeal against addition made under Section 68 for alleged bogus share capital. Three share subscribers - Aakansha Advisory Services Pvt Ltd, Sunirmiti Mercantile Pvt Ltd and Arihant Enterprises Ltd - demonstrated adequate creditworthiness through their balance sheets and financial statements for FY 2016-17. The Tribunal held that assessee successfully discharged onus by establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions. CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal solely on grounds of FY 2015-16 statements being furnished instead of FY 2016-17 was incorrect. Non-compliance with notices under Section 133(6) alone cannot justify addition when substantive evidence of creditworthiness exists. Addition deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=794937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Share Capital Addition Under Section 68 Deleted After Subscribers Prove Creditworthiness Through Financial Statements</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85427</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed appeal against addition made under Section 68 for alleged bogus share capital. Three share subscribers - Aakansha Advisory Services Pvt Ltd, Sunirmiti Mercantile Pvt Ltd and Arihant Enterprises Ltd - demonstrated adequate creditworthiness through their balance sheets and financial statements for FY 2016-17. The Tribunal held that assessee successfully discharged onus by establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions. CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal solely on grounds of FY 2015-16 statements being furnished instead of FY 2016-17 was incorrect. Non-compliance with notices under Section 133(6) alone cannot justify addition when substantive evidence of creditworthiness exists. Addition deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>