Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed writ petitions challenging show cause notices under FEMA, upholding preliminary objection regarding maintainability due to available statutory remedies. Court determined that existence of appellate mechanisms under Sections 19(1) and 35 of FEMA provided adequate alternative remedies. Allegations of bias and natural justice violations were rejected, as subordinate officer's affidavit did not indicate prejudgment by adjudicating authority. Regarding limitation period, Court held that five-year timeline cannot be universally applied, as reasonable delay depends on case-specific circumstances. Omission of Section 6(3)(b) FEMA did not invalidate show cause notices as provision remains applicable to past actions. Petitioners directed to pursue statutory appeals rather than invoke writ jurisdiction.
HC dismissed writ petitions challenging show cause notices under FEMA, upholding preliminary objection regarding maintainability due to available statutory remedies. Court determined that existence of appellate mechanisms under Sections 19(1) and 35 of FEMA provided adequate alternative remedies. Allegations of bias and natural justice violations were rejected, as subordinate officer's affidavit did not indicate prejudgment by adjudicating authority. Regarding limitation period, Court held that five-year timeline cannot be universally applied, as reasonable delay depends on case-specific circumstances. Omission of Section 6(3)(b) FEMA did not invalidate show cause notices as provision remains applicable to past actions. Petitioners directed to pursue statutory appeals rather than invoke writ jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
