Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
HC dismissed writ petitions challenging show cause notices under FEMA, upholding preliminary objection regarding maintainability due to available statutory remedies. Court determined that existence of appellate mechanisms under Sections 19(1) and 35 of FEMA provided adequate alternative remedies. Allegations of bias and natural justice violations were rejected, as subordinate officer's affidavit did not indicate prejudgment by adjudicating authority. Regarding limitation period, Court held that five-year timeline cannot be universally applied, as reasonable delay depends on case-specific circumstances. Omission of Section 6(3)(b) FEMA did not invalidate show cause notices as provision remains applicable to past actions. Petitioners directed to pursue statutory appeals rather than invoke writ jurisdiction.