TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
CESTAT determined appellant entitled to drawback interest from 14.04.2003 (one month after "let export order" date) rather than from 01.07.2012 as initially granted. Under Customs Act s.75A and Drawback Rules r.13, interest calculation begins one month from customs clearance order, not from date of show cause notice resolution. CESTAT rejected department's prolonged litigation as grounds for delayed interest, noting appellant shouldn't be penalized for departmental proceedings. The tribunal distinguished from Web Knit Exports precedent, emphasizing that export value documentation was complete and verified at initial filing. Appeal succeeded, granting interest from original eligibility date through drawback payment date at s.27A prescribed rate.
CESTAT determined appellant entitled to drawback interest from 14.04.2003 (one month after "let export order" date) rather than from 01.07.2012 as initially granted. Under Customs Act s.75A and Drawback Rules r.13, interest calculation begins one month from customs clearance order, not from date of show cause notice resolution. CESTAT rejected department's prolonged litigation as grounds for delayed interest, noting appellant shouldn't be penalized for departmental proceedings. The tribunal distinguished from Web Knit Exports precedent, emphasizing that export value documentation was complete and verified at initial filing. Appeal succeeded, granting interest from original eligibility date through drawback payment date at s.27A prescribed rate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
