Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC denied bail to the accused in a PMLA case involving an extortion racket targeting rice millers. The accused allegedly orchestrated collection of Rs. 40 per quintal from special incentive payments. ED investigation revealed the accused as a key conspirator who facilitated proceeds of crime through threats to withhold MARKFED payments. Despite claims of insufficient direct evidence, the Court found substantial material establishing a money trail and strong nexus between the accused and co-conspirators. Considering the organized nature of the crime, gravity of allegations, and stringent provisions under Section 45 PMLA, the Court rejected bail application under Section 483 BNSS read with Section 45 PMLA for offenses under Sections 3 and 4 PMLA.
HC denied bail to the accused in a PMLA case involving an extortion racket targeting rice millers. The accused allegedly orchestrated collection of Rs. 40 per quintal from special incentive payments. ED investigation revealed the accused as a key conspirator who facilitated proceeds of crime through threats to withhold MARKFED payments. Despite claims of insufficient direct evidence, the Court found substantial material establishing a money trail and strong nexus between the accused and co-conspirators. Considering the organized nature of the crime, gravity of allegations, and stringent provisions under Section 45 PMLA, the Court rejected bail application under Section 483 BNSS read with Section 45 PMLA for offenses under Sections 3 and 4 PMLA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.