Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded deposits made during investigation. While the deposited amount was initially appropriated by Original Authority as duty against demand, appellant sought interest on refund. Following Mafatlal Industries precedent on jurisdictional scope under Art. 226 and Art. 32, tribunal determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Sec. 11BB of Central Excise Act from deposit date until actual refund date. Despite recognizing interest entitlement, appeal failed on other substantive grounds. Decision upholds legislative framework governing refund interest while respecting constitutional remedies' scope.
CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded deposits made during investigation. While the deposited amount was initially appropriated by Original Authority as duty against demand, appellant sought interest on refund. Following Mafatlal Industries precedent on jurisdictional scope under Art. 226 and Art. 32, tribunal determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Sec. 11BB of Central Excise Act from deposit date until actual refund date. Despite recognizing interest entitlement, appeal failed on other substantive grounds. Decision upholds legislative framework governing refund interest while respecting constitutional remedies' scope.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
