Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded deposits made during investigation. While the deposited amount was initially appropriated by Original Authority as duty against demand, appellant sought interest on refund. Following Mafatlal Industries precedent on jurisdictional scope under Art. 226 and Art. 32, tribunal determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Sec. 11BB of Central Excise Act from deposit date until actual refund date. Despite recognizing interest entitlement, appeal failed on other substantive grounds. Decision upholds legislative framework governing refund interest while respecting constitutional remedies' scope.
CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded deposits made during investigation. While the deposited amount was initially appropriated by Original Authority as duty against demand, appellant sought interest on refund. Following Mafatlal Industries precedent on jurisdictional scope under Art. 226 and Art. 32, tribunal determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Sec. 11BB of Central Excise Act from deposit date until actual refund date. Despite recognizing interest entitlement, appeal failed on other substantive grounds. Decision upholds legislative framework governing refund interest while respecting constitutional remedies' scope.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
