Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded deposits made during investigation. While the deposited amount was initially appropriated by Original Authority as duty against demand, appellant sought interest on refund. Following Mafatlal Industries precedent on jurisdictional scope under Art. 226 and Art. 32, tribunal determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Sec. 11BB of Central Excise Act from deposit date until actual refund date. Despite recognizing interest entitlement, appeal failed on other substantive grounds. Decision upholds legislative framework governing refund interest while respecting constitutional remedies' scope.
CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded deposits made during investigation. While the deposited amount was initially appropriated by Original Authority as duty against demand, appellant sought interest on refund. Following Mafatlal Industries precedent on jurisdictional scope under Art. 226 and Art. 32, tribunal determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Sec. 11BB of Central Excise Act from deposit date until actual refund date. Despite recognizing interest entitlement, appeal failed on other substantive grounds. Decision upholds legislative framework governing refund interest while respecting constitutional remedies' scope.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
