Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
PCIT issued revision notice under s263 based on audit objections regarding unexplained property investments and bank deposits. The second notice dated 17.2.2022 introducing new issues exceeded statutory two-year limitation period. AO had previously examined property investments and ICICI bank account through s148 proceedings, conducting specific inquiries with documented evidence. ITAT determined this wasn't a case of inadequate inquiry as AO had performed necessary investigations and maintained proper records. Following precedents from SC and ITAT Chandigarh, the revision proceedings were deemed invalid both procedurally and substantively. The PCIT's order was quashed, and assessee's appeal was allowed, confirming that AO's original assessment addressing both disputed issues was proper and complete.
PCIT issued revision notice under s263 based on audit objections regarding unexplained property investments and bank deposits. The second notice dated 17.2.2022 introducing new issues exceeded statutory two-year limitation period. AO had previously examined property investments and ICICI bank account through s148 proceedings, conducting specific inquiries with documented evidence. ITAT determined this wasn't a case of inadequate inquiry as AO had performed necessary investigations and maintained proper records. Following precedents from SC and ITAT Chandigarh, the revision proceedings were deemed invalid both procedurally and substantively. The PCIT's order was quashed, and assessee's appeal was allowed, confirming that AO's original assessment addressing both disputed issues was proper and complete.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
