Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of PCIT issued revision notice under s263 based on audit objections regarding unexplained property investments and bank deposits. The second notice dated 17.2.2022 introducing new issues exceeded statutory two-year limitation period. AO had previously examined property investments and ICICI bank account through s148 proceedings, conducting specific inquiries with documented evidence. ITAT determined this wasn't a case of inadequate inquiry as AO had performed necessary investigations and maintained proper records. Following precedents from SC and ITAT Chandigarh, the revision proceedings were deemed invalid both procedurally and substantively. The PCIT's order was quashed, and assessee's appeal was allowed, confirming that AO's original assessment addressing both disputed issues was proper and complete.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
