Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
PCIT issued revision notice under s263 based on audit objections regarding unexplained property investments and bank deposits. The second notice dated 17.2.2022 introducing new issues exceeded statutory two-year limitation period. AO had previously examined property investments and ICICI bank account through s148 proceedings, conducting specific inquiries with documented evidence. ITAT determined this wasn't a case of inadequate inquiry as AO had performed necessary investigations and maintained proper records. Following precedents from SC and ITAT Chandigarh, the revision proceedings were deemed invalid both procedurally and substantively. The PCIT's order was quashed, and assessee's appeal was allowed, confirming that AO's original assessment addressing both disputed issues was proper and complete.
PCIT issued revision notice under s263 based on audit objections regarding unexplained property investments and bank deposits. The second notice dated 17.2.2022 introducing new issues exceeded statutory two-year limitation period. AO had previously examined property investments and ICICI bank account through s148 proceedings, conducting specific inquiries with documented evidence. ITAT determined this wasn't a case of inadequate inquiry as AO had performed necessary investigations and maintained proper records. Following precedents from SC and ITAT Chandigarh, the revision proceedings were deemed invalid both procedurally and substantively. The PCIT's order was quashed, and assessee's appeal was allowed, confirming that AO's original assessment addressing both disputed issues was proper and complete.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.