Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled in favor of taxpayer regarding treatment of gains from diamond sales. Assessee received rough diamonds as gift from grandfather in AY 1994-95, which were later processed and sold. The Tribunal determined the period of holding should be calculated from gift receipt date, qualifying the assets as long-term capital assets. Despite conflicting CBDT circulars, ITAT held that statutory provisions prevail over administrative circulars. The gains were properly characterized as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) u/s 2(42A) of Income Tax Act, rejecting revenue's attempt to treat proceeds as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. The documented chain of possession, processing, and sale established legitimate transaction basis, negating revenue's unexplained credit allegations.
ITAT ruled in favor of taxpayer regarding treatment of gains from diamond sales. Assessee received rough diamonds as gift from grandfather in AY 1994-95, which were later processed and sold. The Tribunal determined the period of holding should be calculated from gift receipt date, qualifying the assets as long-term capital assets. Despite conflicting CBDT circulars, ITAT held that statutory provisions prevail over administrative circulars. The gains were properly characterized as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) u/s 2(42A) of Income Tax Act, rejecting revenue's attempt to treat proceeds as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. The documented chain of possession, processing, and sale established legitimate transaction basis, negating revenue's unexplained credit allegations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
