<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Tribunal: Gains from Gifted Diamonds Are Long-Term Capital Gains, Holding Period Counts from Gift Receipt Date.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85240</link>
    <description>ITAT ruled in favor of taxpayer regarding treatment of gains from diamond sales. Assessee received rough diamonds as gift from grandfather in AY 1994-95, which were later processed and sold. The Tribunal determined the period of holding should be calculated from gift receipt date, qualifying the assets as long-term capital assets. Despite conflicting CBDT circulars, ITAT held that statutory provisions prevail over administrative circulars. The gains were properly characterized as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) u/s 2(42A) of Income Tax Act, rejecting revenue&#039;s attempt to treat proceeds as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. The documented chain of possession, processing, and sale established legitimate transaction basis, negating revenue&#039;s unexplained credit allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Tribunal: Gains from Gifted Diamonds Are Long-Term Capital Gains, Holding Period Counts from Gift Receipt Date.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85240</link>
      <description>ITAT ruled in favor of taxpayer regarding treatment of gains from diamond sales. Assessee received rough diamonds as gift from grandfather in AY 1994-95, which were later processed and sold. The Tribunal determined the period of holding should be calculated from gift receipt date, qualifying the assets as long-term capital assets. Despite conflicting CBDT circulars, ITAT held that statutory provisions prevail over administrative circulars. The gains were properly characterized as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) u/s 2(42A) of Income Tax Act, rejecting revenue&#039;s attempt to treat proceeds as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. The documented chain of possession, processing, and sale established legitimate transaction basis, negating revenue&#039;s unexplained credit allegations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:24:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>