Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC set aside orders from Appellate Authority and Primary Authority regarding disputed Input Tax Credit claims under GST. The court found procedural violations, specifically non-compliance with Sections 107(8) and 107(12) of JGST Act 2017. The Appellate Authority failed to provide mandatory hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned written order stating determination points and decisions. Court noted petitioner had submitted required documents including ASMT-11 response, contradicting respondents' claim of no reply. Matter remanded to Primary Authority with directions to issue hearing notice, consider submitted documents including online ASMT-11 response, and pass reasoned order in accordance with law.
HC set aside orders from Appellate Authority and Primary Authority regarding disputed Input Tax Credit claims under GST. The court found procedural violations, specifically non-compliance with Sections 107(8) and 107(12) of JGST Act 2017. The Appellate Authority failed to provide mandatory hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned written order stating determination points and decisions. Court noted petitioner had submitted required documents including ASMT-11 response, contradicting respondents' claim of no reply. Matter remanded to Primary Authority with directions to issue hearing notice, consider submitted documents including online ASMT-11 response, and pass reasoned order in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
