<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Input Tax Credit Claims Under GST Rejected Due to Procedural Violations of Sections 107(8) and 107(12), HC Orders Fresh Hearing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85213</link>
    <description>HC set aside orders from Appellate Authority and Primary Authority regarding disputed Input Tax Credit claims under GST. The court found procedural violations, specifically non-compliance with Sections 107(8) and 107(12) of JGST Act 2017. The Appellate Authority failed to provide mandatory hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned written order stating determination points and decisions. Court noted petitioner had submitted required documents including ASMT-11 response, contradicting respondents&#039; claim of no reply. Matter remanded to Primary Authority with directions to issue hearing notice, consider submitted documents including online ASMT-11 response, and pass reasoned order in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=792111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Input Tax Credit Claims Under GST Rejected Due to Procedural Violations of Sections 107(8) and 107(12), HC Orders Fresh Hearing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85213</link>
      <description>HC set aside orders from Appellate Authority and Primary Authority regarding disputed Input Tax Credit claims under GST. The court found procedural violations, specifically non-compliance with Sections 107(8) and 107(12) of JGST Act 2017. The Appellate Authority failed to provide mandatory hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned written order stating determination points and decisions. Court noted petitioner had submitted required documents including ASMT-11 response, contradicting respondents&#039; claim of no reply. Matter remanded to Primary Authority with directions to issue hearing notice, consider submitted documents including online ASMT-11 response, and pass reasoned order in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:40:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>