Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC set aside orders from Appellate Authority and Primary Authority regarding disputed Input Tax Credit claims under GST. The court found procedural violations, specifically non-compliance with Sections 107(8) and 107(12) of JGST Act 2017. The Appellate Authority failed to provide mandatory hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned written order stating determination points and decisions. Court noted petitioner had submitted required documents including ASMT-11 response, contradicting respondents' claim of no reply. Matter remanded to Primary Authority with directions to issue hearing notice, consider submitted documents including online ASMT-11 response, and pass reasoned order in accordance with law.
HC set aside orders from Appellate Authority and Primary Authority regarding disputed Input Tax Credit claims under GST. The court found procedural violations, specifically non-compliance with Sections 107(8) and 107(12) of JGST Act 2017. The Appellate Authority failed to provide mandatory hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned written order stating determination points and decisions. Court noted petitioner had submitted required documents including ASMT-11 response, contradicting respondents' claim of no reply. Matter remanded to Primary Authority with directions to issue hearing notice, consider submitted documents including online ASMT-11 response, and pass reasoned order in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
