Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal concerning unexplained money under s.69A, rejecting additions based on difference between agreement to sale and final sale deed values. The Tribunal upheld that registered sale deed value prevails over unregistered agreement amounts. Additions under s.69A based on loose papers were deleted as these were deemed "dumb documents" lacking corroborative evidence. Regarding undisclosed cash receipts, ITAT found transactions were properly accounted through partner's capital account. Unexplained expenditure additions under s.69C were deleted as Revenue failed to establish alleged payments. Following precedent, Tribunal held loose sheets/diaries inadmissible as evidence for additions. ITAT emphasized registered sale deeds' sanctity over mere agreements to sale without contrary evidence.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal concerning unexplained money under s.69A, rejecting additions based on difference between agreement to sale and final sale deed values. The Tribunal upheld that registered sale deed value prevails over unregistered agreement amounts. Additions under s.69A based on loose papers were deleted as these were deemed "dumb documents" lacking corroborative evidence. Regarding undisclosed cash receipts, ITAT found transactions were properly accounted through partner's capital account. Unexplained expenditure additions under s.69C were deleted as Revenue failed to establish alleged payments. Following precedent, Tribunal held loose sheets/diaries inadmissible as evidence for additions. ITAT emphasized registered sale deeds' sanctity over mere agreements to sale without contrary evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.